[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#425050: initramfs-tools: Ask if we should update all initramfses

also sprach Gabor Gombas <gombasg@sztaki.hu> [2007.05.19.1832 +0200]:
> > Come on. `useless debconf proliferation'? The question has medium
> > priority. I can also make it an configration option somewhere and use
> > that, but it was just a convenient why to get info from a user.
> I'd also say a debconf question is overkill. People who understand what
> the option means can edit a config file by hand.

They can set their debconf priority. It's not something to avoid,
adding debconf questions.

Anyway, I propose that update-initramfs just loses the -k switch or
provides a new wrapper that packages like cryptsetup and mdadm just
call without worrying whether it will update all initrds or just the
current one.

 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply to: