Re: Mandatory -dbg packages for libraries?
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 22:02:37 +0200, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> Am Sonntag 22 April 2007 21:39 schrieb Neil Williams:
> > Apart from those limitations, is there a *technical* reason why -dbg
> > packages should not be available? Is it worth taking to -policy?
>
> You essentially need to build all library packages 2 times, then.
Why would you do that? (btw, you already build them twice if you provide
a shared and a static library, but adding debugging symbols doesn't
change that)
Cheers,
Julien
Reply to: