Re: Beryl Maintainer
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 10:00:48AM -0400, David Nusinow <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 11:38:39AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 11:55:30AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 14 February 2007 00:27, Anibal Avelar wrote:
> > > > Hi. I see you have in queue NEW three packages: beryl-plugins,
> > > > beryl-settings and emerald  and not ready (yet) beryl.
> > >
> > > Firstly, the beryl packages were REJECTED because of license issues. Upstream
> > > is working with me on resolving the non-free/license issues that remain these
> > > will be fixed for the 0.2.0 stable release of Beryl (coming soon).
> > >From their homepage:
> > Mar 14: 0.2.0 Released
> > But they also already have 0.2.1 versions available.
> If someone wants to work on Beryl and help us out, that'd be great. Shawn
> seems to have gotten frustrated with the project, and I've been looking to
> recruit someone to work on it.
Is it really worth working on beryl when they are merging with compiz ?