[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: centralized bzr (Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools)



>>>>> "Adeodato" == Adeodato  <"=?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?=" <dato@net.com.org.es>> writes:

    Robert> Could you please run 'bzr upgrade' while using bzr
    Robert> 0.9rc1. If my guess at your situation is right this will
    Robert> take a while to run, but correct your performance issues.

    >> Did I do something wrong?

    >> bam@margay:~/bzr/diary-data$ bzr upgrade
    >> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/__init__.py:21:
    >> DeprecationWarning: Modifying DEFAULT_IGNORE was deprecated in
    >> version 0.9. Consider using
    >> bzrlib.ignores.add_unique_user_ignores o r
    >> bzrlib.ignores.add_runtime_ignores
    >> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/bzrlib/plugins/bzrtools/__init__.py:22:
    >> DeprecationWarning: Modifying DEFAULT_IGNORE was deprecated in
    >> version 0.9. Consider using
    >> bzrlib.ignores.add_unique_user_ignores o r
    >> bzrlib.ignores.add_runtime_ignores bzr: ERROR: The branch
    >> format Bazaar-NG meta directory, format 1 is already at the
    >> most recent format.

    Adeodato> No. You just need to upgrade your bzrtool package to 0.9
    Adeodato> as well.

I had 0.9 installed already when doing this:

ii  bzrtools            0.9.0-1             Collection of tools for bzr

So what is going wrong?

    >> Anyway, I tried the revert operation again with 0.9-2. Memory
    >> usage was still high (205meg at one point), but bounded - much
    >> better. The operation successfully completed this time.

    Adeodato> Sounds acceptable to close ##380412, then?

Yes, sounds good to me.
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>



Reply to: