Re: dh_python and python policy analysis
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 11:21:26AM +0200, Josselin Mouette <email@example.com> wrote:
> Le samedi 26 août 2006 à 00:16 +0200, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > > You can put them wherever you want as long as this complies with the FHS
> > > and that a set of .rtupdate/.rtinstall/.rtremove scripts take care of
> > > them. This is one of the only things that are currently standardized.
> > Wasn't it possible to have only one implementation of these provided by
> > python itself, the policy relying on those and only one location for
> > python modules ?
> This was the original plan proposed back in January. Until the python
> maintainer forced its cancellation (#347758), then came up with a
> broken, incompatible implementation.