On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 06:42:30PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Carlos Z. F. Liu: > > > [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/03/msg00226.html > > This talks about a different OPL, not the VIM one. This may actually be a typo in the Vim documentation. The help specifies that it uses the Open Publication License (the same license used by Steve Oualline for his Vim book) yet the URL is for the Open Content License. Both license texts use the OPL acronym, which may be the cause of the confusion. There's an open bug against Vim (#384019). I'll bring up the inconsistency with Bram and add his response to the bug report. James -- GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega <jamessan@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature