severity 383493 serious thanks Hi, On Thursday 17 August 2006 18:45, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: > FYI, I've now filed this as #383493. (Filed as "important" rather than > "serious" to avoid stepping on the toes of release people.) I've learnt that not filing bugs with the appropriate severity does more harm than good. We do want Etch to comply with FHS 2.3, don't we?! :) Note that FHS 2.1 didn't mention /usr/local/etc, while 2.3 does. I'd say this explains why we have this bug today. http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-2.3.html#USRLOCALLOCALHIERARCHY regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpUQHmWMp7HI.pgp
Description: PGP signature