[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Successful and unsuccessful Debian development tools

also sprach Thijs Kinkhorst <thijs@debian.org> [2006.08.02.1020 +0100]:
> > This shouldn't need snapshot.debian.net, right?
> If the bug is claimed to be fixed in the changelog of 2.0-5 and the
> current sid version is 2.0-7, I don't know another way to see the diff
> between 2.0-4 and 2.0-5, since both are not available from the regular
> archives. How would you handle this?

I misunderstood you. I thought you were talking about differences
between the current and the sarge version, which are obviously
available without snapshot.d.n

Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
"the search for the perfect martini is a fraud. the perfect martini
 is a belt of gin from the bottle; anything else is the decadent
 trappings of civilization."
                                                            -- t. k.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)

Reply to: