On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 02:18:27AM -0400, Eric Dorland <email@example.com> wrote:
> * Mike Hommey (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:47:32AM -0400, Eric Dorland <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > * Matthew Garrett (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
> > > > Eric Dorland <email@example.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Just to point out that as of Firefox/Thunderbird 2 the entire codebase
> > > > > is triple licensed under the MPL, GPL and LGPL and any objection to
> > > > > the MPL as far as Mozilla is concerned is fairly academic at this
> > > > > point.
> > > >
> > > > Seriously? That's absolutely great. Is there any sort of announcement of
> > > > this anywhere?
> > >
> > > Seriously:
> > > http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/gerv/archives/2006/03/relicensing_complete.html.
> > Actually, only the trunk has the relicensing complete, and the trunk is
> > Firefox 3. Firefox 2 will still be in the same state as previous
> > releases, but we know most of its code is available in upstream cvs in a
> > really triple licensed form.
> Really? Gerv's post is incorrect?
Last time I checked (and it was after Gerv's post), the relicensing changes
were still not applied to the MOZILLA_1_8_BRANCH. Things seem to have
changed, but that needs some checking. I took some random files to check
and found out files that are not tri-licensed in the trunk, so... *sigh*