[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: failure notice



Hi,

MD, Please fix.

regards,
	junichi

At 8 Jul 2006 16:27:28 -0000,
MAILER-DAEMON@viper2.netfort.gr.jp wrote:
> 
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at viper2.netfort.gr.jp.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
> 
> <md@Linux.IT>:
> 213.254.12.146 does not like recipient.
> Remote host said: 554 Service unavailable; Client host [219.75.232.131] blocked using dul.dnsbl.sorbs.net; Dynamic IP Addresses See: http://www.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?219.75.232.131
> Giving up on 213.254.12.146.
> 
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
> 
> Return-Path: <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
> Received: (qmail 15734 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2006 16:27:16 -0000
> Received: from unknown (HELO dancer64.netfort.gr.jp.netfort.gr.jp) (127.0.0.1)
>   by viper2.netfort.gr.jp with SMTP; 8 Jul 2006 16:27:16 -0000
> Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 01:27:18 +0900
> Message-ID: <87wtaodpuh.dancerj%dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
> From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
> To: md@Linux.IT (Marco d'Itri)
> Cc: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>,
> 	377384@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#377384: udev is ignoring group ownership: sshfs does not work under normal user
> In-Reply-To: <20060708155543.GC21068@wonderland.linux.it>
> References: <87psgggldh.dancerj%dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
> 	<20060708155543.GC21068@wonderland.linux.it>
> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8
>  (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>  MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > > /dev/fuse is created, but it isn't set group permission for fuse; what
> > > might be wrong?
> > Does /etc/udev/rules.d/020_permissions.rules exist?
> > Try to debug this using "udevtest /class/fuse" (or whatever the correct
> > $DEVPATH is).
> 
> It was an already-reported but unfixed bug.
> 
> fuse group isn't reflected to udev since udev isn't restarted since
> fuse user was added.
> 
> I've reassigned the bugs to fuse.
> 
> regards,
> 	junichi
> -- 
> dancer@{debian.org,netfort.gr.jp}   Debian Project
> 



Reply to: