On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:25:39 -0300 "Gustavo Franco" <gustavorfranco@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/30/06, Mike Hommey <mh@glandium.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 11:54:42AM +0200, Tim Dijkstra > > <newsuser@famdijkstra.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:14:07 -0300 > > > "Gustavo Franco" <gustavorfranco@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On 6/29/06, Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > > Software suspend which exists in kernel for several years? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And works properly in Debian since what? Weeks? Months?:-) > > > > > > > > It doesn't really work properly anywhere, does it? :-P > > > > > > Has worked properly here very well with suspend2, which isn't in > > > the stock kernel unfortunately. > > > > Has worked properly here very well with whatever is in the debian > > kernel, since 2.6.15 at least. > > > > Well Mike, maybe very well for you not for many users and some kernel > developers[0] agreed. Btw, Greg wrote an article for lwn (major > suspend changes), > read it there if you're subscribed. Really interesting content that > shows the current problems with the kernel implementation (up to > 2.6.17) that should be solved soon, since Linus came up with a > interesting patch. > > [0] = > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.power-management.general/1884/focus=1884 I didn't read the whole thread, but AFAICS it only talks about a (clever) hack to make debugging suspend-to-ram easier... grts Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature