Re: unstable? nah. :-)

To: sh@tokkee.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: unstable? nah. :-)
From: Miguel Gea Milvaques <xerakko@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 21:15:05 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 44887739.1020301@ellobo>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060608190654.GY11646@albany.tokkee.org>
References: <[🔎] 20060608182921.GF26024@yi.org> <[🔎] 20060608190654.GY11646@albany.tokkee.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sebastian Harl wrote:
>> http://www.crackerjack.net/adserton3.png
> 
> On that picture it says the box is up for 378 days. How does that go with 875
> days idle time?

zoom in!!!!

- --
e-mail: Miguel Gea Milvaques <xerakko@debian.org>
Blog: http://www.livejournal.com/users/xerakko/
GnuPG key: 0x580808C4
Key fingerprint = 85A0 06FD 9A6C 4701 27C2  5536 3533 50CA 5808 08C4
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEiHc5NTNQylgICMQRAlBSAJ9liEoHPwVp7oYrKJguxGBnzfyykQCbBvSV
jwzHdfuS2tkPRJ/M4mqBiF0=
=m9vJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

References:
- unstable? nah. :-)
  - From: Tyler MacDonald <tyler@yi.org>
- Re: unstable? nah. :-)
  - From: Sebastian Harl <sh@tokkee.org>

Prev by Date: Re: unstable? nah. :-)
Next by Date: Re: unstable? nah. :-)
Previous by thread: Re: unstable? nah. :-)
Next by thread: Re: unstable? nah. :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread