Re: unstable? nah. :-)

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: unstable? nah. :-)
From: Sebastian Harl <sh@tokkee.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 21:06:55 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20060608190654.GY11646@albany.tokkee.org>
Reply-to: sh@tokkee.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060608182921.GF26024@yi.org>
References: <[🔎] 20060608182921.GF26024@yi.org>

> http://www.crackerjack.net/adserton3.png

On that picture it says the box is up for 378 days. How does that go with 875
days idle time?

Cheers,
Sebastian
-- 
Sebastian "tokkee" Harl
GnuPG-ID: 0x8501C7FC
http://tokkee.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: unstable? nah. :-)
  - From: Tyler MacDonald <tyler@yi.org>
- Re: unstable? nah. :-)
  - From: Miguel Gea Milvaques <xerakko@debian.org>
- Re: unstable? nah. :-)
  - From: Roland Mas <lolando@debian.org>

References:
- unstable? nah. :-)
  - From: Tyler MacDonald <tyler@yi.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal
Next by Date: Re: unstable? nah. :-)
Previous by thread: unstable? nah. :-)
Next by thread: Re: unstable? nah. :-)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread