Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal
Matthew Garrett <email@example.com> writes:
> Starting with "What is key for Debian" makes it sound like a policy
> statement on behalf of Debian, and "Just fix the license" could then
> be interpreted as a demand from Debian that Sun alter the license. In
> that context, it seems reasonable to point out that Walter is not in a
> position to speak on behalf of Debian.
That's entirely reasonable. Perhaps I misinterpreted aj's message
somewhat. It seemed to me to be placing rather more emphasis on Walter
not being a DD.
Jeremy Hankins <firstname.lastname@example.org>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03