Re: Renaming a package
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek wrote:
[...]
>> Anyway, as noted in my previous mail to this thread, when testing this
>> method on unstable and sarge, I hit a bug in apt that rules it out for
>> etch. If you still like this method, we can get the necessary fixes in
>> and promote it for etch+1, though.
>
> IMHO it definitely seems worth doing.
IMHOtoo. I liked this solution for renaming a package, because its
quite simple to implement and provides a seamless upgrade.
Even though renaming a package is probably not something which is done
every day, having a clean solution for it would be a good thing.
Regards,
Andreas
- --
Andreas Fester
mailto:andreas@littletux.net
WWW: http://www.littletux.net
ICQ: 326674288
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEgLiLZ3bQVzeW+rsRAtqGAJ9CSQHgkYt79jQEe0UT0gt7HsZKfACdGPMp
qfYEq2tWN1bUMwuyM/athGM=
=XP76
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: