Re: LSB init scripts and multiple lines of output
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Daniel Jacobowitz <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2006.06.01.2012 +0200]:
>> Starting RAID device md0 ... 3 drives, done
>> Starting RAID device md1 ... 3 drives, done
>> Starting RAID device md2 ... 2/3 drives, degraded
>> Starting RAID device md3 ... 1/3 drives, failed
>> Starting RAID device md4 ... 3 drives, done
> What do people think about that?
> The only problem is that I start them all at once, then parse the
> output. So the above is not really true.
Starting them individually just seems "better" IMO, more atomic.
For example, if starting md1 pukes really hard, the parent process
still exists to start md.
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Is "common sense" really valid?
For example, it is "common sense" to white-power racists that
whites are superior to blacks, and that those with brown skins
are mud people.
However, that "common sense" is obviously wrong.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----