[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sun Java available from non-free

On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 22:56 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 21 mai 2006 à 22:38 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
> > Given this legal background of yours, could you please help by using that
> > to improve the licence, instead of just complaining about how others
> > handled it? Please give the right example.
> I'm afraid I have more interesting things to do than helping non-free
> software developers to get their non-free crap in the non-free archive.

If you do not care about "non-free crap", I don't mind.

> By the way, they also have the power to accept GNOME 2.14 in main. Don't
> you think that would have been more productive than accepting the Sun
> JVM?

Indeed I think that wouldn't have necessarily more productive, but I
certainly know that it's not at all relevant to this discussion.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: