Re: Please reject to rule on the ndiswrapper question
Bas Zoetekouw writes:
> Hi Wouter!
>
> You wrote:
>
> > The correct way to proceed would seem to be a ruling by a body
> > authorized to make authoritative interpretations of the Social Contract,
> > or, failing that (since I believe we have no such body), a General
> > Resolution.
>
> Wouldn't the ftp-masters be the right authority for this issue? It is
> them who decide if the package can go into main or not.
The package is already in main. The person who filed this bug thinks
the maintainer and ftp-master decisions were wrong and should be
changed or overruled.
Michael Poole
Reply to: