Thomas Dickey, your mail is bouncing...
Hopefuly someone helpful person on debian-devel has another means to
contact him, if he doesn't know already?
ttfn/rjk
Mail Delivery System writes:
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).
>
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
>
> dickey@radix.net
> SMTP error from remote mailer after MAIL FROM:<richard@sfere.greenend.org.uk>:
> host mail1.radix.net [207.192.128.31]: 550 5.0.0 Unauthorized Sender Jul 05
>
> ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
>
> Return-path: <richard@sfere.greenend.org.uk>
> Received: from [172.17.207.1] (helo=sfere.anjou.terraraq.org.uk)
> by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
> (return-path richard@sfere.greenend.org.uk)
> id 1FAmKD-0002xn-00; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:01:57 +0000
> Received: from richard by sfere.anjou.terraraq.org.uk with local (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian))
> id 1FAmKC-0001iC-55; Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:01:56 +0000
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Message-ID: <wwvy8077gt7.fsf@rjk.greenend.org.uk>
> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:01:56 +0000
> From: Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk>
> X-Face: h[Hh-7npe<<b4/eW[]sat,I3O`t8A`(ej.H!F4\8|;ih)`7{@:A~/j1}gTt4e7-n*F?.Rl^
> F<\{jehn7.KrO{!7=:(@J~]<.[{>v9!1<qZY,{EJxg6?Er4Y7Ng2\Ft>Z&W?r\c.!4DXH5PWpga"ha
> +r0NzP?vnz:e/knOY)PI-
> X-Boydie: NO
> X-Mailer: Norman
> To: Thomas Dickey <dickey@radix.net>
> Cc: 283232@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#283232: screen, delete keys and terminal types
> In-Reply-To: <20060218162736.GB2521@saltmine.radix.net>
> References: <5HyLi-iU-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
> <20060218162736.GB2521@saltmine.radix.net>
> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1
>
> Thomas Dickey writes:
> > nsterm is the recommended $TERM for Terminal.app; report bugs
> > against that rather than screen (reading screen's source code should
> > give a hint why it's better to make the terminal description correct
> > than continue hacking screen).
>
> That's useful to know. Thankyou for chiming in.
>
> ttfn/rjk
Reply to: