Re: Amendment to GR on GFDL, and the changes to the Social Contract
On 8 Feb 2006, Anthony Towns stated:
> Personally, I hope and trust that the developer body are honourable
> enough to note vote for a proposal they think contradicts the social
> contract or DFSG; and I don't see much point to all the implications
> that we're not that honourable and need to have the secretary's
> adult supervision. I don't see much point to all the grumbling about
> the secretary's supervision either though -- if we're acting like
> adult's anyway, that's hardly a problem, is it?
I find it strange you couch this in terms of honour and
supervision. I do not understand how this can be; and I certainly do
not hold this view, since I do not even understand it.
I view this a ballot correctness issue. The ballot should be
one that does not lead to contradictory situations,or else, in my
opinion, the ballot is buggy.
Killing turkeys causes winter.
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C