Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?
- To: Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-python@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?
- From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:55:57 -0800
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87d5hw9m6a.fsf@becket.becket.net>
- In-reply-to: <1138288663.12468.29.camel@silicium.ccc.cea.fr> (Josselin Mouette's message of "Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:17:43 +0100")
- References: <20060119204554.GP18803@alcor.net> <20060119212329.GC28833@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20060119214718.GQ18803@alcor.net> <20060119225820.GA12818@localdomain> <20060119231848.GV18803@alcor.net> <20060119233855.GC12818@localdomain> <20060120001551.GZ18803@alcor.net> <87psmnik6m.fsf@becket.becket.net> <20060120050930.GG18803@alcor.net> <87k6cvh0a7.fsf@becket.becket.net> <20060120172252.GP18803@alcor.net> <87d5ilvrms.fsf@becket.becket.net> <1138288663.12468.29.camel@silicium.ccc.cea.fr>
Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> writes:
> Sorry, but there's a whole new generation of Debian developers here that
> simply won't develop anything in perl, just because perl looks too
> complex and cryptic to us. Now, with bash, perl and python, we can deal
> with the scripting needs for at least a few releases; trying to
> anticipate what will happen later is pure speculation.
I'm in that category too. Perl has always looked crazy to me.
Scheme, anyone?
Reply to: