Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 07:18:24PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 07:14:45PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le samedi 28 janvier 2006 à 18:55 +0100, Wouter Verhelst a écrit :
> > > > Because python and ruby have (...)
> > > I disagree. (...)
> > This is only (...) maniacs. (...) is better, because (...)
> Hah. A language that does not require a specific coding style is better,
> because it allows me to work as is the most efficient for me.
I think we should instead make 'whitespace' essential: Irregardless of
your coding style, it looks the same to the eye, so has the best of both
worlds.
--Jeroen
P.S.: Can we please not go this way?
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
Reply to: