Re: when and why did python(-minimal) become essential?
Am 2006-01-17 13:28:07, schrieb Adam Borowski:
> A quick comparison of fresh unconfigured i386 chroots:
>
> 94420 woody
> 146140 sarge
> 160264 etch
> 185444 sid
>
> a +25MB increase, even though etch is nearly in sync.
>
> With standard/important packages, you simply don't install them; removing
> required/essential ones is not trivial. Extra bloat doesn't
> noticeably hurt Ubuntu because Ubuntu doesn't try to support memory
> sticks, old hardware, embedded things or farms of tiny virtual machines;
> Debian does. No one cares about wasting some memory and disk space on a
> modern desktop.
Not right, because I run automated Backups on all of my 116 Servers,
Routers and Workstations and do not like to have some extras to backup
which I do not need, not want to have. I realy care about the size of
my installed systems.
Greetings
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
--
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 ICQ #328449886
50, rue de Soultz MSM LinuxMichi
0033/3/88452356 67100 Strasbourg/France IRC #Debian (irc.icq.com)
Reply to: