Hi,
no, this is not really about the GFDL issue currently discussed, but about
using the unmodified GFDL template in debian/copyright. Besides not being
able to tell who has the copyright, it makes it also impossible to tell if
there are invariant sections and/or cover texts.
Lots of packages (including most of kde, but also gcc-x.y-base, gdb, mtools,
groff-base) are affected.
Do a
find /usr/share/doc -name copyright -exec grep -l "YOUR NAME" {} \;
to find those packages on your system. (This might cause a few false
positives, figlet for example is not affected :)
AIUI, no matter how the outcome of the GFDL GR will be, these are bugs which
needs to be fixed. So to me it smells like another mass bug filing, probably
with user tags.
Hm, on a second thought this (*) _might_ be a feature: the GFDL says invariant
sections need to be listed, but there aren't any, as a template has been
used. Yay ?!
What do you think ?
regards,
Holger
Attachment:
pgpzSmYOxSyAG.pgp
Description: PGP signature