[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: Backports
To
:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: Backports
From
: "John Gee" <
azswazsw@hotmail.com
>
Date
: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:34:07 -0800
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
BAY23-F26AC04E9819E32CB23430CF1F0@phx.gbl
>
In-reply-to
: <
[🔎]
BAY23-F8DBCBD14BBE92A5892CEECF1B0@phx.gbl
>
So is it safer for me to use backports or to get ubdated software from
testing? Which will be more stable on my stable system?
_________________________________________________________________
Don?t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
Reply to:
debian-devel@lists.debian.org
John Gee (on-list)
John Gee (off-list)
References
:
Re: Emphasize teams, not packages
From:
"John Gee" <azswazsw@hotmail.com>
Prev by Date:
Re: APT public key updates?
Next by Date:
Re: Obsolete packages in Experimental
Previous by thread:
Re: Emphasize teams, not packages
Next by thread:
Re: Bug#345091: ITP: checkgmail -- Alternative Gmail Notifier for Linux via Atom feeds
Index(es):
Date
Thread