Le mardi 17 janvier 2006 à 12:46 -0600, Adam Heath a écrit : > On Tue, 17 Jan 2006, Anthony Towns wrote: > > > > What I find very dissapointing is that mdz asked on debian-devel twice > > > for a decision from debian how ubuntu should handle the maintainer Field > > > without any luck: > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00678.html > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/05/msg00260.html > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/01/msg00966.html > > Debian developers set the Maintainer field to themselves(or a team), when they > upload to Debian. The upstream author is only mentioned in the copyright > file. > > Ubuntu should do something similiar. Set the Maintainer field to someone from > their group, and mention debian in the copyright(or other appropriate place). Even better, they could stop crediting themselves for changes initiated by Debian developers. http://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-news/2005-December/000033.html -- .''`. Josselin Mouette /\./\ : :' : josselin.mouette@ens-lyon.org `. `' joss@debian.org `- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=