Re: Canonical's business model
Daniel Ruoso <daniel@ruoso.com> writes:
> Em Qua, 2006-01-11 às 14:36 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG escreveu:
>> Gustavo Franco <gustavorfranco@gmail.com> writes:
>> > It was already discussed[0], and there's no consensus on this idea of
>> > "every Ubuntu changeset, a patch in Debian BTS" between DDs.
>> Right. I want Ubuntu to exercise judgment, and not just give a big
>> pile of patches, some of which are Debian-relevant and some of which
>> are not. Think, for example, of the normal way a Debian developer
>> should interact with upstream.
>
> This is exactly the point, what can I do with a patch if I don't know
> why it's there? Which problem is it trying to address (I know, I can
> read the patch and guess, but WTF), and why such solution was adopted...
> Everytime I submit a patch, I also submit this reasoning...
Of course, but Ubuntu doesn't submit patches.
Reply to: