Re: Need for launchpad

[Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>]

Benjamin Seidenberg <astronut@dlgeek.net> writes:

> Oh, it gets even better. The fun part is that the one who wants to
> receive the list may not be the one who actually transmits the signal
> (and hence would be at fault). That'd be the transmitting station. for
> those who are having trouble following, think of this analogy. I
> (client send a request to another station (server) asking for the
> list. It (server) sends back the message, with the bad language. Thus,
> the transmitting station (server) is at fault, even though it's most
> likely automated.
>
>
> Isn't it all so fun?

I think it means that Ham operators are responsible for their content,
and are not common carriers.  Nor is it the idea of Ham Radio to turn
Ham operators into common carriers.  

Thomas