Re: Packet radio and foul language
On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 20:25 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Benjamin Seidenberg <astronut@dlgeek.net> writes:
> > Err, sorry, I meant § 97.113(a)(4).
> >
> > Also, my previous message applies to amateur operators in the US.
> > Amateurs in other nations are similiary regulated by their equivelent to
> > the FCC, with similar rules which are all based on ITU regulations.
>
> So what's the likelihood that this is actually a problem? 0.00001%?
> 0.00000000001%?
>
> And by what bizarre standard is saying "foo sucks" really profane???
> Ok, by the "wackos like ed meese" standard maybe -- but nobody cares
> about that.
1. Well, Ed Meese does... :)
2. Ed Meese??? Geez, did you have to tip-toe when you were young?
(Because the earth hadn't cooled yet?)
> In the extremely unlikely event that it is a problem, why should it be
> up to list posters to deal with it? If some readers use a service
> governed by authorities that are prudish to an absurd degree, it seems
> like the onus is on them to try and deal with the probably technically;
How exactly do IP packets get transmitted via packet radio? Morse
code, with binary files uuencoded?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
"Man, I'm pretty. Hoo Hah!"
Johnny Bravo
Reply to: