[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Experimental or unstable.



Nicolas François wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:03:37PM +0000, Simon Huggins wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 02:44:38PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
>>> * Marc Haber [Thu, 05 Jan 2006 14:40:45 +0100]:
>>>> Experience with adduser shows that no-one besides the maintainers
>>>> themselves and their closest environment uses experimental packages.
>>>   More evidence:
>>>     http://www.perrier.eu.org/weblog/2005/09/30#experimental-useless
>> See this worries me a bit.
>>
>> I'd love for Debian users to test some more cutting edge versions of
>> packages (partly so upstream gets more testers, partly so I can see the
>> bits I hate about the new versions and try to get them fixed) but I
>> don't want them in testing now until they are properly released as a
>> stable series.  In fact, I don't really want them in unstable if it
>> means that in order to fix bugs which appear in testing I have to revert
>> to the stable set of packages in order to get them in.
> 
> How Debian users can know there is a new version in experimental?
> There are some messages in debian-devel, or blogs on planet, but not all
> users or developers are reading them.
> 
> Is there a command that can display the list of packages I'm using with a
> version on experimental higher than the current version on unstable?
> 

`aptitude -t experimental`

For some edge cases this will only work if you are currently tracking
unstable.

I love aptitude :)

Travis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: