Re: net-tools maintenance status
On 11/29/05, Olaf van der Spek <email@example.com> wrote:
> On 11/29/05, Bernd Eckenfels <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
> > > And nearly four months later, the package has 92 bugs, 16 with patch
> > > and a lot even without a single response.
> > This is not true.
> What part isn't?
> > Stop bothering me.
> > Most of the patches are not valid.
> Shouldn't the patch tag be removed and an explanation given then?
> > Please work on the bugs which are tagged as help needed.
> Why would I do that while I'm waiting for the status of the patch I
> already wrote?