Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:22:55 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87k6evm1tc.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20051125002705.GA26906@chistera.yi.org> (Adeodato Simó's message of "Fri, 25 Nov 2005 01:27:05 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 877jb0iswl.fsf@nahar.marcbrockschmidt.de> <[🔎] 87fypntzzo.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] 20051123160817.GB13417@cyan.localnet> <[🔎] 87oe4a5523.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <[🔎] 20051125002705.GA26906@chistera.yi.org>

* Adeodato Simó:

> * Florian Weimer [Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:28:04 +0100]:
>
> Hi,
>
>> AFAIK, binary NMus aren't announced on debian-devel-changes.
>
>   Binary-only uploads are announced in the appropriate
>   debian-devel-$ARCH-changes list.

According to

<http://murphy.debian.org/lists/debian-devel-i386-changes/details.html>

these lists are dead.  Or am I missing something?

Reply to:

References:
- dpkg-sig support wanted?
  - From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@debian.org>
- Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
  - From: Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au>
- Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
  - From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
- Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
  - From: Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>

Prev by Date: Re: Heimdal autotools dramas
Next by Date: Re: Bug#340606: ITP: libsub-name-perl -- Assigns a new name to referenced sub
Previous by thread: Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
Next by thread: Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread