Re: Secret changes for binNMUs
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org> wrote:
> [...]
> > Meanwhile, I am using this: unversioned depends and two conflicts: (<<
> > {Upstream-Version}), (>= {Upstream-Version}.1).
>
> Depends: foo (>={Upstream-Version}), foo (<< {Upstream-Version}.1)
>
> instead should also work without the need for a cumbersome <<conflict.
Yes. It is just a matter of which one you like better. You could also have
one depends and one conflicts instead of two conflicts or two depends.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
Reply to: