This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said: > Stephen Gran wrote: > > This one time, at band camp, Thiemo Seufer said: > > > Btw, about this simple-minded test: > > > 299 of those are maintained by the Debian Install System Team, and > > > nobody there felt compelled to put debian-boot@l.d.o in the changelog > > > for whatever reason. > > > > What is the difference betwen this: > > > > Maintainer: Debian Octave Group <pkg-octave-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> > > Changed-By: Rafael Laboissiere <rafael@debian.org> > > > > and this: > > > > Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <debian-boot@lists.debian.org> > > Changed-By: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org> > > > > If you can show me where one is wrong and the other is right, I'll keep > > quiet. > > None is "wrong" or "right". Both are contents of a .changes file, > unavailable for a (re-)build from source. But the .dsc is. This stuff is easily traceable, if we want to. I can see the benefit of having the same name in the Maintainer field and in the changelog for some. I can see arguments against it, but none that make it an RC bug. We still have the original signatures on the dsc and changes to find out who uploaded it, if we're interested. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature