Re: There must be bug. But where?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: There must be bug. But where?
From: Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:12:04 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1132780324.12303.2.camel@localhost>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 878xvfglni.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
References: <1132624455.24117.12.camel@localhost> <20051122115432.GA22430@opalsys.net> <1132691488.5078.8.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 1132711116.11710.16.camel@localhost> <[🔎] 878xvfglni.fsf@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

Am Mittwoch, den 23.11.2005, 21:21 +0100 schrieb Goswin von Brederlow:
> Let me just make the suggestion to better use reprepro.

That's not an alternative. It has no easy incoming mechanisms for remote
systems.

Regards, Daniel

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: There must be bug. But where?
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

References:
- There must be bug. But where? (was: Trying to create an Ubuntu repository)
  - From: Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert.spam@gmx.net>
- Re: There must be bug. But where?
  - From: Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Secret changes for binNMUs
Next by Date: Re: dpkg-sig support wanted?
Previous by thread: Re: There must be bug. But where?
Next by thread: Re: There must be bug. But where?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread