Re: RFC: drop kerberos4-support?
Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org> writes:
> You think that December 2006 (the expected release time of etch) is too
> early to drop Kerberos 4?
I'm not sure. I think it's going to be tight for some people, but on the
other hand not shipping etch with MIT Kerberos 1.5 is not exactly
appealing. I expect, though, that Stanford will be in a situation where
that will be fine with us by December, and we're historically one of the
slower sites to migrate, so maybe it will be okay.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: