This one time, at band camp, Florian Weimer said: > * Jochen Voss: > > > Hello, > > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2005 at 07:04:02PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote: > >> There were also some bugs for tetex-* that were never sent to the > >> Maintainer: field, namely the debian-tetex-maint mailing list. > > Here is another one. The following message (related to bug #335689) > > spend six days in the vincinity of master. > > > > Received: from master.debian.org (master.debian.org [146.82.138.7]) > > by dd1234.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391E91752C5 > > for <voss@seehuhn.de>; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:21:27 +0100 (CET) > > Given kasserver.com's recent connectivity issues, I wouldn't consider > that admissable evidence. 8-P A 7 hour delay in email is, I agree, not that compelling, especially if the receiving end has known connectivity issues. This one time, at band camp, Jochen Voss said: > Received: from qa by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) > id 1EWRAJ-00020H-00; Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:20:59 -0600 > Received: from spohr.debian.org [140.211.166.43] by master.debian.org with > esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1EUQ6i-0000Rb-00; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 > 09:48:56 -0500 This is the actually interesting block - how did it take 5 days on the same machine? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : sgran@debian.org | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature