On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 06:07:58PM -0500, Michael Poole wrote:
> Andrew Suffield writes:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:48:53PM -0800, Erast Benson wrote:
> >> CDDL works similar way, except on per-file basis.
> >
> > This is incomprehensible gibberish.
>
> This is unsupportable hyperbole. Erast's statement may be inapt,
> wrong, misleading, or have any number of other flaws, but it is
> neither incomprehensible nor gibberish.
It makes no sense at all, therefore it is both incomprehensible and
gibberish (they're roughly synonyms).
incomprehensible
2: difficult to understand
gibberish \gib"ber*ish\ (j[i^]b"b[~e]r*[i^]sh or
2. Incomprehensible, [or ...]
Grow up, and find something less crazy to do than picking on people
bigger than you.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
`. `' |
`- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature