Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8
From: Anthony DeRobertis <anthony@derobert.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 21:31:46 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 4345D002.80402@derobert.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20051006225420.GA6495@informatik.uni-bremen.de>
References: <4UqyJ-8gb-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <4UxAf-1hi-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <4UF4L-4Hj-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <4UGb3-6xj-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <4UHUm-VR-305@gated-at.bofh.it> <4UKxB-5q3-33@gated-at.bofh.it> <4ULka-6Jm-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <[🔎] 20051006225420.GA6495@informatik.uni-bremen.de>

Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Upgrading to SHA-1 is still a good idea, of course,

Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't there been collision attacks on
SHA-1, too?

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8
  - From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#331528: ITP: debinstaller -- a graphical frontend for installing local .deb packages
Next by Date: Re: When is the C++ transition needed?
Previous by thread: Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8
Next by thread: Re: Packages that need to be rebuilt agaisnt libssl0.9.8
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread