also sprach Martin Langhoff <email@example.com> [2005.08.30.1404 +0200]: > But I'm leaving the Arch (tla/baz/bzr) boat too - patch-oriented SCMs > were fun, but very disappointing. There is a central design flaw in > pure patch tracking, and neither Arch nor DARCS do anything about it: > no matter how much you track patches merged, you need to be able to > identify convergence. GIT does this so well by being > identity-oriented, that you can do a ton of patch trading on top (via > email, StGIT, quilt, whatever) and things still make sense after > merging and remerging ad infinitum. How does git aide you in identifying the differences in changes between two trees? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <firstname.lastname@example.org> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! micro$oft windoze: proof that p. t. barnum was correct.
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)