OT: Re: arch, svn, cvs (was: Bug#323855: ITP: opencvs -- OpenBSD CVS implementation with special emphasis in security)
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:33:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Marc Haber <mh+debian-devel@zugschlus.de> [2005.08.19.1422 +0200]:
> > > Compared to SVN from the view of somebody who is acquainted with CVS,
> > > arch sucks badly. I tend to agree with most of the things that Florian
> > > Weimer lists on http://www.enyo.de/fw/software/arch/design-issues.html
> >
> > I won't go through the trouble to compile the extensive list of
> > problems and design issues with SVN.
>
> vim! emacs!
>
> zsh! bash! something else!
apt! rpm!
<shudder>autopackage</shudder>
Reply to: