On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 07:47:01AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 03:41:43PM -0700, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2005 at 02:00:04PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 12:06:29PM +0100, Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> wrote: > > > > (...) > > > > The 'reopen' command takes an optional submitter argument, so it was > > > > difficult to get a version in here unambiguously. Instead, we've > > > > introduced a new 'found' command, which says "I've found the bug in this > > > > version of the package". You can use this whether the bug is open or > > > > closed; if the bug's closed and you give a version more recent than the > > > > last recorded fixed version, the bug will be considered open again. > > > > found 1234567 1.3-2 > > > > 'found' is now preferred to 'reopen' except when reopening bugs that > > > > were closed without a version (e.g. closed as invalid). > > > > When you mail nnnnnn-done without Version:, i.e. the old way of closing > > > > bugs, the bug tracking system does approximately what it always did and > > > > records the bug as closed for all versions of the package containing it. > > > > Obviously, this loses the benefits of version tracking, and is now > > > > intended only for pseudopackages and for closing bugs that were never > > > > bugs to start with. It's still OK to use 'reopen' in the traditional way > > > > to reopen such bugs in a versionless way, although the 'found' control > > > > command without a version number works too. > > > I was wondering, what is the correct way to handle when you're stupid > > > and close the wrong bug in changelogs ? (like i did with #321876, when i > > > intended to close #321976) > > AIUI, this falls under the use case described above for the "found" control > > command. > In the case i'm referring to, the bug is said to be fixed for a > particular version of *my* package, not of the bug package. > If I say it is found for a version, it will be found for a version of > the bug package, right ? > Or maybe one can prepend package/ to the version number ? Uh... no idea. Try it and see, and report back? :) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature