[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: fresh blood gets congested: long way to become DD



On 02/08/05, Kevin Mark <kmark+debian-devel@pipeline.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2005 at 03:31:36PM +1200, Nigel Jones wrote:
> > On 02/08/05, Stepan Golosunov <stepan@golosunov.pp.ru> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 08:24:30PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> > > >  Nothing. It was just a question, as Nikita sounds to be a female name,
> > > > but as I'm not sure about it, I was just interested. At least for me, a
> > > > Hungarian, it sounds like a female name.
> > >
> > > In Russia, Nikita is (exclusively) male name.
> > Hmmm, can we maybe get back to the ON Topic part of this?
> >
> > Personally I think get a couple of active developers that have been
> > around a little while that maintain a few packages and get them into
> > the AM role, and move some of the AMs into a DAM role...
> >
> > Also: say that if an AM/DAM does not process x applications a month
> > (reasonably fair amount (say 5) and allow for vaccations/sickness etc)
> > then they may face removal, as Yaroslav Halchenko said, there are ~61
> Hi Nigel,
> would it be helpful to have some kind of status check every 6mo. to ask
> the AM's if they have the available time to process N apps. Something
> like 'no time','vacation','accepting N applicants'. If folks know who is
> 'open for business', it eliminates the confusion as who to ask. Then
> again, I just realized that I have no idea how NM and AM get
> 'connected'. So maybe someone can point me to the DOCS on this.
That sounds way better than what I suggested, but yeah.
> Cheers,
> kev
> --
> counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
>       `$'         $'
>        $          $                      _
>  ,d$$$g$  ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b
> ,$P'  `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$'  `$ $  "'   `$ $$' `$
> $$     $ $$ggggg$ $     $ $ ,$P""  $ $    $
> `$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $    $
>  `Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $.  ,$.
> 
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQFC7wveRp+kG4Nu//URAu7jAJ4ib989xVtl7kHpY23eayZMcV19WwCdFBR8
> rHlabRo1mYSKM32falSIcH8=
> =CZqP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 


-- 
N Jones
Blogging @ http://nigelj.blogspot.com
Proud Debian & FOSS User
Debian Maintainer of: html2ps & ipkungfu



Reply to: