On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 11:19:46PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Yaroslav Halchenko <email@example.com> writes: > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 01:51:53PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > >>> I'm not sure if any additional AMs are necessary -- there is a > >>> sufficient quantity of them to cover all current DD applicants... > >> No. > > Indeed - I counted "grave stones" as well. So there are 61 registered > > AMs. And just 39 from them are "active" (ie having ND assigned and not > > yet waiting for DAM) with next AMs being most active: > > > > 19 he > > 11 joerg > > Well, both Joerg and me want to reduce the number of applicants we're > processing at the same time, so more AMs would really be helpful. > > The problem is that Application Managers need to be able to invest some > time on a regular basis *and* know a lot about Debian Policy, Packaging > and QA. That's the reason for the usual "AMs should be DDs for 6 > months". We know that this is very general, but it allows people to gain > experience as mentors and sponsors. Sometimes, we ignore it - when people > have shown their skills in the NM checks, for example. > > It's not easy to see how well someone will work as Application Manager > before they actually do it. AMs who used to be very responsive, friendly > and tried to explain everything tend to get bored by the repetition; Hi 'HE' (one day I shall find the origin of this), If AM's repeatedly answer the same questions, then have those answers been made into a FAQ(not having googled for an answer)? (if so, could you point me to its location). Just curious (as one day I may get there x-)) Cheers, Kev -- counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted! `$' $' $ $ _ ,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b ,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$ $$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $ `$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $ `Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
Description: Digital signature