[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?

Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On 20050708T181259-0400, Johan Kullstam wrote:
>>What signal is meant by 3.1 versus 4.0?  Does your intended audience
>>have any concept of the distinction?
> The usual distinction, when it is made, is that bumping the major number
> indicates a disruptive upgrade (changing how things work, not just
> adding new things).

the change of gcc 3 to gcc 3 is disruptive (to c++ binaries)


Reply to: