Re: configure a program -- debconf abuse?
On 7/9/05, Gustavo Noronha Silva <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Em Ter, 2005-07-05 às 21:32 +1000, Hamish Moffatt escreveu:
> > > Keeping the question priority at 'low' make sure most users will not
> > > see the question, and that only reconfigure will present it. I hope
> > > you are not setting the debconf priority limit to low. :)
> > If we recommend against setting the priority to low, why bother with it?
> Enabling debconf pre-seeding for customized installs is a good enough
> justification IMO.
Isn't debconf a bit 'expensive' just to allow pre-seeding?