Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?

To: Bryan Gruneberg <bryan@hbgtech.com>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 14:21:04 +0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 1120821664.25292.58.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200507080919.48234.bryan@hbgtech.com>
References: <[🔎] 1120787845.7684.10.camel@pug.anu.edu.au> <[🔎] 20050708071522.GA2570@negoyl> <[🔎] 200507080919.48234.bryan@hbgtech.com>

On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 09:19 +0200, Bryan Gruneberg wrote:
> Debian 2006 ( it can be released in 2008 though) 

Debian 2006.0

:P

--
David Moreno Garza <damog@damog.net> | http://www.damog.net/
 If you want to make God laugh, tell him your future plans. 
 GPG: C671257D - 6EF6 C284 C95D 78F6 0B78 FFD3 981C 5FD7 C671 257D

Reply to:

References:
- should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
  - From: Drew Parsons <dparsons@debian.org>
- Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
  - From: René van Bevern <rvb@pro-linux.de>
- Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
  - From: Bryan Gruneberg <bryan@hbgtech.com>

Prev by Date: Re: GCC 4.0 as the default GCC / C++ ABI change
Next by Date: Re: Question about kill(1)
Previous by thread: Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
Next by thread: Re: should etch be Debian 4.0 ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread