On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 12:01:22AM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote: > On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 09:00:28 +0200, Nicolas Kreft wrote: > > Is it for a special reason that the default dhcp-client > > in sarge is ancient (version 2.0pl5)? > > > Some years ago when the release of sarge was supposed to be imminent > it was decided not to adopt dhcp3 as the default because there wouldn't be > enough time to adjust to it before the release. Then the release was > delayed for a couple of years; meanwhile the maintainers of dhcp and dhcp3 > have been busy with other things. > FWIW, I've recently become a co-maintainer, and now the Sarge has released, I'm planning on bringing dhcp3 up to date with the latest upstream and having a good bash at all the bugs. regards Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature