On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Hey Adeodato,
>
> Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2005, 04:29 +0200 schrieb Adeodato Simó:
> > but on the
> > packaging side they work as closely as possible: common VCS repository
> > and whatever.
>
> This sounds really cool.
>
>
> > specially for non-experienced packagers, doesn't help here
> > either (correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems that getting a sponsored
> > upload to universe happens faster and more easily than a sponsored
> > upload to sid).
>
> We get those people there. Our NEW packages policy states that every
> completely new package has to be reviewed by at least 3 maintainers or
> MOTUs. The packages in question are in a pretty good state and the MOTU
> hopefuls work incredibly hard to get into it.
>
>
> > - an ITP is filed if they intend to search a for a Debian sponsor
> > and maintain the Debian package themselves, otherwise a RFP is
> > submitted
>
> To be honest, I wasn't that familiar with the Debian administrative
> devices, but if these measures help in any way, I will discuss it in the
> MOTUMeeting ( http://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTUMeeting ).
Hi Daniel,
check out: http://debian.home.pipeline.com/ and look for the
newdebian2.png for a somewhat accurate idea of how things work.
Comments/questions welcomed.
Cheers,
Kev
--
counter.li.org #238656 -- goto counter.li.org and be counted!
`$' $'
$ $ _
,d$$$g$ ,d$$$b. $,d$$$b`$' g$$$$$b $,d$$b
,$P' `$ ,$P' `Y$ $$' `$ $ "' `$ $$' `$
$$ $ $$ggggg$ $ $ $ ,$P"" $ $ $
`$g. ,$$ `$$._ _. $ _,g$P $ `$b. ,$$ $ $
`Y$$P'$. `Y$$$$P $$$P"' ,$. `Y$$P'$ $. ,$.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature