Hi Stephen, On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 09:16:15AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > Have you actually got a specific problem with the changes I did, or > really, the results of them? There were a couple problems where people > had old libldap2's hanging around (which is a rather serious mistake > anyway...) but I havn't seen any other problems with that change yet... I had a bad feeling in how the linker or ldconfig would react given that the soname does not match the file name of the library anymore. After some discussion on irc I am convinced that the symlink way is the best thing we can do. I improved the libldap2.postinst a bit so that it should be able to handle any libldap.so.2.0.xx leftover files. Greetings Torsten
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature